Developers Struggle as Over 800 High-Rise Projects Face Safety Hurdles

The UK’s construction industry is facing widespread delays as more than 800 high-rise residential projects remain stalled due to prolonged safety approval processes. The Building Safety Regulator, established under the Building Safety Act 2022, is responsible for ensuring that all new high-rise developments meet stringent fire and structural safety standards before construction begins.

However, the Gateway 2 approval process, a critical checkpoint for high-rise projects, has become a major bottleneck. Developers are caught in lengthy review cycles, with applications taking months to process. The delays are increasing costs, creating uncertainty, and potentially undermining the UK’s housing targets. Industry experts are now calling for urgent reform to streamline safety approvals while maintaining high building standards.

The role of the Building Safety Regulator in high-rise construction

The Building Safety Regulator was introduced as part of post-Grenfell reforms aimed at improving building safety standards for high-risk residential developments. It oversees compliance with fire and structural safety regulations, ensuring that all new high-rise buildings—typically those over 18 metres or seven storeys—meet strict criteria before construction can move forward.

One of the key checkpoints in this regulatory framework is Gateway 2, which requires developers to submit detailed safety and design plans before breaking ground. These submissions include fire risk assessments, escape route planning, structural integrity reports, and materials compliance documentation.

While these regulations are designed to prevent safety failures, developers are encountering lengthy delays in obtaining approvals. The backlog is growing, leaving many projects in limbo and creating financial and operational challenges for construction firms.

The impact of approval delays on the construction industry

The backlog in Gateway 2 approvals is having a severe impact on the UK’s construction sector. With more than 800 applications stuck in regulatory review, developers are facing extended project timelines, rising costs, and potential financial losses.

One of the most significant concerns is the effect on housing supply. The UK government has set ambitious targets to increase the availability of housing, particularly in urban areas where high-rise developments are essential. However, with projects stalled in the approval process, fewer homes are being built, exacerbating the housing shortage.

Delays are also creating financial strain on developers, who must continue paying for land, labour, and materials without being able to move forward. The slowdown in construction is pushing up costs for buyers and renters, as fewer homes become available.

Urban regeneration projects, many of which depend on high-rise developments, are also being affected. The uncertainty caused by these delays is making investors and developers hesitant to commit to future projects, potentially affecting long-term construction trends.

Developers’ concerns and industry frustrations

Frustration is growing among developers, who say they are struggling with unclear submission requirements, poor communication from regulators, and inconsistent feedback. A key issue is the lack of pre-application consultation, which leaves developers guessing about what will be required for approval. This often leads to repeated revisions and extended delays.

Many in the industry say that regulatory expectations are vague and open to different interpretations. Developers report difficulty getting timely responses from the regulator, with some waiting months for basic clarifications. The absence of a prioritisation system also means that minor revisions are treated with the same level of scrutiny as complex cases, further slowing the process.

Some developers are calling for the introduction of phased approvals, which would allow projects to begin work on non-structural elements while safety checks continue. Others are urging regulators to provide clearer guidelines and better communication to prevent unnecessary resubmissions.

What industry experts are saying and potential reforms

As frustrations mount, industry bodies and construction experts are pushing for reforms to make the Gateway 2 approval process more efficient. The Fire Industry Association has been particularly vocal, warning that the current system is overly complex and causing unnecessary delays.

Experts have suggested several key improvements. Clearer submission guidelines would help developers understand exactly what is required, reducing the number of rejected applications. A phased approval system could allow construction to begin on certain elements while safety reviews continue, easing the backlog.

Better communication between developers and regulators could also speed up approvals. A pre-application consultation process would allow developers to resolve potential issues before formally submitting their plans. Some industry leaders have called for a case tracking system, similar to those used in planning applications, to provide real-time updates on approval status.

Another potential solution is increasing resources for the Building Safety Regulator. Many in the industry believe that delays are partially due to a lack of staff and digital tools within the regulator’s office. Hiring additional reviewers and implementing automated document processing could reduce wait times. Developers acknowledge the importance of maintaining rigorous safety standards, but many argue that the current approval framework must be improved to prevent unnecessary delays.

With hundreds of projects awaiting approval, developers and industry stakeholders are questioning whether the backlog will ease in 2025. While the Building Safety Regulator has acknowledged the delays, it has not yet committed to any formal reforms, leaving many uncertain about the future.

Sources:

To keep up-to-date with our latest construction and civil engineering news, subscribe to our newsletter today.