HS2’s Hidden Wildlife Costs Climb to £216 Million With New Bat Protection Tunnel
Subscribe to our free newsletter today to keep up to date with the latest construction and civil engineering news.
HS2 has long faced scrutiny for rising budgets and extended timelines. Few, however, expected that one of its most debated expenses in 2025 would be a kilometre-long tunnel designed not for trains, but for bats. Officially named the Sheephouse Wood Bat Mitigation Structure, this mesh tunnel protects one of Britain’s rarest mammals, the Bechstein’s bat, along HS2’s route in Buckinghamshire.
The Department for Transport has now confirmed the total cost of the structure and related civil works: £216 million. This figure has renewed debate about the real price of environmental compliance in Britain’s infrastructure sector.
The origins of the bat shed and the legal requirements behind it
Bechstein’s bats are among the UK’s most strictly protected species under domestic and EU-derived environmental law. These small, woodland-dependent mammals are sensitive to habitat disturbance. Any major transport corridor cutting through ancient woodland risks fragmenting their foraging territory.
When HS2’s route passed through Sheephouse Wood, conservation groups raised concerns about the impact on local bat colonies. To secure planning permission and remain within the law, HS2 Ltd was required to build a dedicated mitigation structure. The result was the kilometre-long mesh tunnel that guides the bats safely over the rail corridor.
Cost breakdown and escalating figures
Early designs projected a far lower price for the bat structure. By 2024, the cost had already reached £100 million, raising eyebrows among politicians and taxpayers alike. The final cost, now confirmed at £216 million, covers not only the tunnel itself but extensive supporting civil engineering. HS2 Ltd says the figure reflects difficult ground conditions, intricate design demands and a high bar for environmental approvals.
The project required more than 8,000 permits, each needing surveys, consultation and legal sign-off. Critics highlight that the cost equates to hundreds of thousands of pounds for each bat expected to use the crossing. While striking, this figure also reflects the reality that any failure to comply with conservation law could expose HS2 to even larger liabilities.
Political and public reactions
Politicians have voiced sharp criticism. Environment Secretary Steve Reed called the structure an “absurd expense” that diverts resources from core public services. HS2 chair Sir Jon Thompson defended the tunnel as unavoidable, given strict conservation requirements. Some industry observers see this as an example of good intentions colliding with the economics of large-scale rail.
Environmental groups say infrastructure must protect biodiversity regardless of the price. Local critics argue the tunnel shows Britain’s planning system struggles to balance green rules with taxpayers’ money. HS2’s wider reputation for cost overruns only intensifies this scrutiny.
The Sheephouse Wood structure has become a symbol of how large rail projects and wildlife laws interact. Supporters argue robust protection is a sign of a responsible society, even if it drives up construction costs. Others counter that the tunnel proves the need to streamline planning or revisit how rules are applied. As HS2 advances, the bat shed stands as a reminder that hidden costs can emerge long after budgets are agreed.
Sources: